Sarah High
Mrs. Thomas
SEGL 102
16 April, 2013
Shielding Homeless Children from a
Frail Future
Imagine little eight year old
Elizabeth coming home from school to find every possession that is dear to her sitting
on the street corner. With tears in her
eyes she questions her mom, “Why?” The
only response is “We just can’t live here anymore.” Because Elizabeth and her family are not
financially stable, they are forced to leave their home with only some
clothing, a few toys, and pictures, with nowhere to stay. Some nights they are lucky enough to stay in
an overly crowded shelter, sleeping on cots, other nights they have to sleep in
the car with all of their belongings.
They have to take showers at the local truck stop, and eat dinner at the
local soup kitchen, that is if they aren’t waiting in line to enter the
shelter. Some days little eight-year old
Elizabeth goes hungry, other days she goes un-bathed. She only has her fretful parents there to
comfort her, but they seem too anxious to realize her pain. Elizabeth use to be a social butterfly, but
now she is ill-fated and full of sorrow.
Through all of this, Elizabeth’s parents expect her to concentrate in school,
and her teachers expect her to complete her homework. Can you picture this famished girl struggling
to concentrate on her multiplication tables because of the lifestyle she now
has to live?
Millions of individuals are put into
situations just like Elizabeth’s a year.
According to the article “Student’s Without Homes” by Vicky Dill,
between 1.4 and 1.5 children are left homeless yearly. Because of the harsh conditions homeless
children have to encounter, they experience severe and permanent bearings which
make it difficult for them to concentrate on school. Reporters state homeless children struggle in
school with grades, behavior, attendance, and test scores, which could result
in high retention and dropout rates (Anderson, Hendricks and Barkley, Miller,
Murphy and Tobin). This shapes their
entire life, possibly giving them an undeserved outcome.
There are many agencies and programs
such as, the United States Interagency
Council on Homelessness, the National
Association for the Education of Homeless Children and Youth, the National Coalition for the
Homeless, and the United States Government who focus on
raising awareness towards homeless and finding them essential resources. President Obama’s plan through the USICH has
fifty-two strategies in place which envisions to end homelessness by the year
2020. The McKinney-Vento Act is one
resource the Government has put into place since 1987, and is one of the few who
work closely with homeless students to help relieve the barriers they
face. In order for homeless children to
succeed in their education and have an optimistic future, many resources need
to collaborate. The government needs to
induce the budget for homeless resources, including towards the McKinney-Vento
Act, the Education Board should assemble learning materials for those who
relocate and need tutoring, along with providing other resources, and homeless
shelters should include an organization that focuses on the children and their
emotional needs, and have a quiet space for homework concentration.
What is the United
States Government’s responsibility?
An acceptable solution to
ensure educational success amongst homeless students would be to concentrate on
homelessness overall. To adequately do
so, by first increasing the Federal budget for addressing poverty, the need for
low-income housing, and providing social services would decrease the
possibilities of being homeless (Murphy and Tobin, p 154). Because many individuals become homeless as a
result of job losses, part of addressing poverty includes job and school
training. In “Opening Doors, Federal
Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness” by the USICH says that “In order to be self-supporting and avoid
homelessness, people need employment. Employment
is dependent on education.”
Those homeless individuals seeking higher
education, job readiness training, or skill development would be offered a
guaranteed grant through Vocational Rehabilitation Services that covers all
expenses, including books, supplies, clothing, transportation, and childcare. Persons
going to job training would be required to attend six months of intense
instruction that focuses on areas of experience. The Federal Government should
offer a tax decrease to businesses who hire individuals coming out of the
training, and in return those at stake have prospects for employment. While enrolled in this program they would
have weekly to bi-weekly contact with a caseworker to ensure all goals are
being met. They will also be obligated to
attend counseling and mental health screenings through area Mental Health
Centers to focus on any substance abuse, parent support, depression, or anxiety,
and be required to continue services for at least five years after establishing
a permanent residence.
According to Murphy and Tobin in
Homelessness comes to School, many
systems already require participation in mental health programs, however they
also acknowledge countless homeless citizens being preoccupied and overwhelmed
with basic survival needs. Therefore
they may decline participation, even if it means risking shelter. Because of this arranging methods to alleviate
key stressors would prove to enhance individual success, allowing them to
concentrate on self-composure. Such
stressors include making sure nutrition and health care needs are being met,
shelter and work are located, and education for their children is being
met. Federal agencies should make sure
there are resources easily available to relieve some of the stress, allowing homeless
persons to concentrate on improving their status.
Since transportation and childcare
are difficult for homeless families to attain, the Vocational Rehabilitation
caseworker would include a thirty dollar voucher for gas a week, as well as a
specialized identification card used for free public transportation. The NCFH is quoted by Murphy and Tobin that
“Childcare is a significant expense for all working families and it may become
a barrier to work for families who are homeless.” For this many counties in the United States
provide free childcare to families for up to fifteen months upon leaving a
shelter (p 178). I propose every state
require early childcare centers to offer free childcare to homeless children,
and up to five years after leaving any homeless situation. Since the centers won’t have any income
coming in from those families, they will be allowed a tax break on all homeless
children attending, as well as federal food grants. Within the five years after completing the
program through Vocational Rehabilitation Services, the families will meet
monthly with a caseworker to validate employment or education. This gives families ample time to ensure
financial and mental health security.
The USICH reports upon passing of
the Health Reform will give every individual who is or is at risk for
homelessness eligibility for Medicaid by 2014, and TANF assistance would
address supporting nutritional needs. Having
this means improved health overall for the homeless population. All families are eligible for these services
based on financial hardship; however, the homeless and those families facing
poverty are at a greater need, and for longer periods of time. When income improves slightly those benefits
are reduced or eradicated completely.
This has families suddenly adjusting their new income causing stress
amongst them, with no improvements toward homelessness. Instead of unexpectedly removing all
benefits, I propose this be a gradual process, which allows six months of
consistent work and permanent residency before removal, then a decreasing of 10%
at a time. This enables them to get
accustomed to their financial adjustment, while improving the rates for falling
back into homelessness.
Some researchers believe that
traumas, including physical and mental health problems, caused by homelessness
would decrease or be alleviated by permanent residency. One issue preventing many families from
receiving housing assistance is defining true homelessness. HUD has one definition, not including those
who are in doubled up situations or residing in motels, and Education Boards consider
a much more vast community. In order for
individuals to receive equal rights to public housing, the Federal Government
should first define homelessness according to the McKinney-Vento Act’s
definition, and all organizations dealing with homeless individuals must be required
to document according to that definition (Murphy and Tobin, p180).
The USICH reports President Obama’s
FY2011 budget for the Recovery Act, which partially focuses on housing homeless
persons. This act has HUD, HHS, and the
Education system working together to provide more than six-thousand vouchers
for rental assistance for those families facing homelessness. With homeless children like Elizabeth being
confronted with personal losses, and unpleasant and traumatic conditions, which
are typically unplanned, they are suffering from psychological and lasting
emotional damages, which are affecting their educational experiences (Dill,
USICH). Because of this, families who
are already living in homeless situations like Elizabeth should be offered
priority to receive those housing vouchers.
Local housing and service systems must be strengthened in order to move quickly
and effectively to provide housing and assistance to all who need it. The quicker families are removed from these
situations, the better chance the children have at a successful future.
In 1987 the Federal Government first
realized how being homeless affects children and their education, and presented
the first law to remove some barriers these children face. This was mainly focused on the transportation
and enrollment issues, which provides all homeless children transportation to
their school of origin and allows enrollment to those who are missing important
documents. Ensuring children have these
was thought to boost attendance and allow children to keep their connections
amongst their peers. The Act was revised
in the 1990’s and again in 2001. The
McKinney-Vento Act mandated every school district in the country to appoint a
homeless liaison, who educates the schools on identifying homeless students and
provides resources these students need (DeMont, Dill, Murphy and Tobin,
Anderson, USICH). The Homeless Liaison
for Spartanburg County School District Seven, Richard Andrews says that the
budget he is given
• I like your introduction story.
ReplyDelete• You have great transition paragraphs and transitions within the paragraphs.
• Some places need a little bit of help in the grammar or sentence structure department, but they can easily be fixed.
• To adequately do so, by first increasing the Federal budget for addressing poverty, the need for low-income housing, and providing social services would decrease the possibilities of being homeless (Murphy and Tobin, p 154).
o Maybe you could restate it as: To adequately do so, increasing the Federal budget for addressing poverty and the need for low-income housing, and providing social services would….. (Murphy…).
• What does the acronym HUD stand for?
• What is the one definition of HUD and what is the definition according to the McKinney-Vento Act?
• What is the President’s budget for the Recovery Act according to the FY2011?
• In your last paragraph (heads-up you didn’t finish it) you mentioned that the act was revised in the 1990’s and again in 2001. How was it revised? What did it say?